Now Playing Tracks

http://wardgal.tumblr.com/post/98131293943/really-a-blog-was-created-to-make-fun-of-another

upper-ecchelon:

wardgal:

Really? A blog was created to make fun of another fan’s opinions and postings bc some couldn’t handle her saying certain things about their fave? Really, an entire blog? And not only that, they made the heading something that would intentionally cause her to hurt bc of the picture they chose….

I don’t think it’s funny at all. I disagree with the views of this individual, but that doesn’t mean I think this kind of behavior is acceptable. It’s tacky and nasty. This is only going to cause further arguments. It’s immature. I want nothing to do with it.

For the record, it is one or two bad apples. The first post (and only post written by this blog) has 24 likes. The second post wasn’t written by this blog, but by another user, and it happened to get reblogged with the 59+ notes. Most of us try to avoid drama, like this. Like I said I don’t agree with the opinions of this user, but that doesn’t mean I think this blog is ok. It’s not.

I will amend my original post then. It was late and I didn’t notice that it was not an original post.

Really? A blog was created to make fun of another fan’s opinions and postings bc some couldn’t handle her saying certain things about their fave? Really, an entire blog? And not only that, they made the heading something that would intentionally cause her to hurt bc of the picture they chose. Like, they went out of their way to use a picture of her dog that she loved and is now deceased in their header bc they knew it would hurt her. Really? Way to represent the Carol or Caryl fandom.

I know they don’t represent the fandom as a whole. IMO, those that like or reblog from this blog have basically given their approval for such bad behavior.

I would hope that there are many in the fandom who would discourage this and who will be vocal about it. It may have started out as a joke but it is not funny.

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

I saw a post talking about Guggenheim's interview about 2x14 and when he talked about about it previous to the incident-of-2x13--that-shall-never-be-named he was all like this is a very Lance family-centric episode and now after all the backlash they've received for you know what(I can't even type the words it makes me sick) he's selling it as Felicity-centric and her reaction to the Sara situation, as that post righteously said, "it's more like damage control-centric." Thoughts???

ihearttvsnark:

Yeah, it screams damage control. He was the first one to tout the ‘Emmy worthy’ moment in the episode. There was also something about a scene with all the Lance family members spilling their secrets. Stephen talked up the Oliver/Laurel stuff.

And suddenly MG turns around and says it’s a big Felicity episode? That definitely sounds like spin control to me. 

As soon as I saw M G’s statement about this episode being “Felicity centric” I knew it was said as a way to calm Felicity fans about the whole Sara/Oliver kiss. Not one other cast member has mentioned that a Felicity centric episode was coming. And even Stephen Amell said he hoped she get one in his Q&A last week. It is obvious that it really wasn’t written an one. And to be honest, I am not looking forward to Watching Felicity feel less than every one else bc Sara is on the team now. She never seemed to question it before.

We make Tumblr themes